Luso-Brazilian Review Luso-Brazilian Review E-TOC Notices
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Luso-Brazilian Rev. 41(1):37-55 (2004); doi:10.3368/lbr.41.1.37
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tosta, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Articles

Machado de Assis: A obra entreaberta1

Antonio Luciano Tosta

This essay discusses an aspect of the narrative of Machado de Assis that I call "entreabertura" (the state of being half-way open). This "in-betweenness" is examined by analyzing the role of the narrator in several of Machado’s novels and short stories. In these works, the Brazilian author simultaneously makes full use of his authorial power while still allowing the reader plenty of opportunities for creatively filling in the gaps of the text, helping to bring it to life. Moreover, on several occasions Machado also leads the reader to make conclusions about the text only to deconstruct them afterwards. Machado’s narrative is analyzed in the light of works by contemporary authors such as Umberto Eco, Roland Barthes, Jacques Derrida, and Linda Hutcheon, as well as those of Machado scholars such as Paul Dixon, Roberto Schwarz, John Gledson, and Enylton de Sá Rego.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2004 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System